|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:13:41 GMT -5
let me add my disclaimer and say that i dig everyone here. now that thats out of the way, whats the deal?
what was your motivation/vision in starting this board? it's cool looking and has some cool members yeah. but, you had problems with all the rules and the moderation correct? i may be wrong so correct me if i am.
this place has only been up a few days or a week and i'm seeing deleted posts my mod(s) all over the place.
that pic i posted was 'questionable'? how come?
what is your goal here? to have a board exactly like JS except there are no curse filters and you're the admin? i mean, the rules are not set. no questionable pics......well wtf does that mean? to me, the pic i posted was not questionable but clearly to you it was.
so please, fill me in. whats the point here? while i do like it, and i like JS, so far this is but a mini JS with different people at the helm. was that the plan?
not trying to start shit and tell you how to run your board, just trying to get a picture of how this place is, and how it's going to be.
what the hell is wrong with a pic of a chick in tight boy shorts showing the knuckle? if it's just that you don't want it, then tell me you just don't want it but then i'll ask, what makes this place different from JS?
please and thanks
|
|
|
Post by valvetronix on Sept 17, 2006 14:15:54 GMT -5
So... Your mad... that he deleted a picture of a pussy? WOW...
This forum is NOT a ripoff of Jam Session. It happens to not have a curse filter, and happens to have alot of the same people.
|
|
|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:19:06 GMT -5
So... Your mad... that he deleted a picture of a pussy? WOW... This forum is NOT a ripoff of Jam Session. It happens to not have a curse filter, and happens to have alot of the same people. did i sound mad? was i flaming? i was polite and i was asking questions...it wasn't a picture of a pussy. i just want to know whats the direction of this going to be. simple question. i like everyone thats here and i'd like to post here but i'd like to know whats questionable and whats not. there are mod edits all over the place. there is no curse filter i know but aside from that, how is this place any different than JS other than the mods are different? simle questions dude.
|
|
|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:20:39 GMT -5
freya is the admin, it's his site so i'd like to hear what his plans are for this place thats all.
whats gonna be different about it from JS and whats gonna be the same? i guess thats the simplified question
edit* just cause i or anyone else asks questions don't mean they're talking shit or flaming. so, double WOW
edit again* i also didn't want to be called a pussy for not saying what i mean. you know how it is. freya is cool. has been since the first day i got to know him. i just want to know what the end result of this forum is gonna be. thats not against the rules is it
|
|
|
Post by emixolydian on Sept 17, 2006 14:23:04 GMT -5
Stop freaking out, dude. He said you cannot post nude pictures or anything that would be questionable as "pornography", because this is a free forum, and the host can delete him at any time for questionable material.
Questionable=if someone saw it they'd say "Thats porn!", so avoid nude breasts and vaginas, and I think you'll be ok.
I haven't seen any posts deleted that weren't strictly nude pictures, the only person who CAN delete posts in freya and theinsaneguitarist.
|
|
|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:26:12 GMT -5
Stop freaking out, dude. He said you cannot post nude pictures or anything that would be questionable as "pornography", because this is a free forum, and the host can delete him at any time for questionable material. Questionable=if someone saw it they'd say "Thats porn!", so avoid nude breasts and vaginas, and I think you'll be ok. again, do i sound like i'm freaking out? i'm being polite. i'm just asking questions. i didn't post a nude pic. i didn't post a pic of tits and i didn't post a pic of a vagina. every time i ask a question is it gonna be taken like i'm 'freaking out'? whats questionable to you or freya is not to me. that pic i posted was not porn. there was no bare private parts. so, again massa, i just want to know what is allowed and what isn't. it's not freaking out, it's a question. there is a difference and i asked freya, not you but thanks for being his proxy well, it wasn't porn. it wasn't nude boobs or a nude vagina so again, please let freya answer so i can get it clear. pretty simple really.
|
|
|
Post by emixolydian on Sept 17, 2006 14:27:15 GMT -5
Yes, you do sound like you're freaking out, thats why I said it.
If you didn't post a questionable picture then I suggest we wait for freya to personaly reply, I'm just reitterating what I've been told.
|
|
|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:28:58 GMT -5
Yes, you do sound like you're freaking out, thats why I said it. If you didn't post a questionable picture then I suggest we wait for freya to personaly reply, I'm just reitterating what I've been told. k well i'm not freaking out for the 50th time. i don't need or want you to reiterate what you've been told. i'd like to see what freya has to say. understand now?[/not freaking out in soft mellow soothing tone]
|
|
|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:30:44 GMT -5
here is a link. no nude tits. no nude beaver. just a flexable position but everything is covered.
-------------
[/still not freaking out]
|
|
|
Post by emixolydian on Sept 17, 2006 14:30:46 GMT -5
If you didn't want anyone else to respond you should have PMed him.
|
|
|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:32:52 GMT -5
If you didn't want anyone else to respond you should have PMed him. i'm kinda the opposite that way. i like to get it out in the open. when there is a thread attn freya, let freya answer. sure you can post but you can't answer my question so why do you keep trying to. i'm just trying to get the point across that 'what is questionable'?
|
|
|
Post by zappa on Sept 17, 2006 14:35:05 GMT -5
oh yeah emix, you're saying i'm freaking out cause i'm being polite and asking questions yet you said that you were not freaking out when you were trying to school les bill on theory. you sounded like you were pretty uptight to me and apparently others thought so too. the tone of my posts ARE DEFINATELY NOT FREAKING OUT LIKE OH MY GOD WHAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND, ARE YOU ILLITERATE? ?...... see the difference?
|
|
|
Post by emixolydian on Sept 17, 2006 14:36:40 GMT -5
I tried to once, dumbass, and then you disagreed with my interpretation of the rules.
I looked at your picture, that is questionable. IF you go to the stickied thread it says "no women in skimpy or provactive clothing" you can see the outline of her freaking vagina, thats pretty "provactive", in my opinion. Anyway, I don't see why not being able to post pictures of naked or provocatively positioned chicks. I'm sure the rule will change once we get the site settled, and possible switch to a paid host where you can basically do whatever the flip you want.
Understand that if you post something in the open other people are going to address it, if you don't like that, then PM him, for the second time.
|
|
|
Post by emixolydian on Sept 17, 2006 14:38:28 GMT -5
oh yeah emix, you're saying i'm freaking out cause i'm being polite and asking questions yet you said that you were not freaking out when you were trying to school les bill on theory. you sounded like you were pretty uptight to me and apparently others thought so too. the tone of my posts ARE DEFINATELY NOT FREAKING OUT LIKE OH MY GOD WHAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND, ARE YOU ILLITERATE? ?...... see the difference? Your tone, and the way you type makes it seem like you are freaking out. Most people react the same way (as we can see Valvetronix did). I freaked out in the end of the discussion with LesBill, because he was too fucknig stupid to understand the most simplistic point. I'm not uptight. I couldn't careless if you posted hardcore porn, but its not my forum- I'm just following the rules and relaying them to you.
|
|
sexymonkey
Junior Member
Long live the Monkays!1!!1
Posts: 448
|
Post by sexymonkey on Sept 17, 2006 14:40:34 GMT -5
If I may just chime in, sometimes your posts sound a lil' like sarcasm Zappa, so I can see where the mis-communication problems may arise, sometimes we hafta try a wee little bit extra to communicate well since tone-of-voice doesn't exist in english.
|
|